HoTWiReZ's DoMaiN

[News BoT]

<p align="center"></p><p><p> <span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: transparent;">We saw some </span><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/7626/msi-motherboards-at-ces-2014-kaveri-and-socketed-kabini" style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: transparent;">socketed Kabini motherboards<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: transparent;"> at CES this year from MSI, and </span><a href="http://chinese.vr-zone.com/98711/amd-will-released-fs1b-in-march-and-final-name-will-be-socket-am1-01192014/" style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: transparent;">Chinese VR-Zone<span style="-webkit-text-stroke-color: transparent;"> has published some interesting numbers regarding processors that are predicted to be on sale in March 2014.</span></p> <p> Aside from the soldered Kabini we already have in, the socketed versions are aimed more towards the consumer range than the industrial PC  or embedded lines that commonly utilise soldered on CPU/APUs.  They will be based on the Jaguar CPU core design, which also means being limited to 64-bit single channel DDR3 memory.  The focus of Kabini in this case is the need is for something just to process primarily in-cache data.</p> <p align="center"> </p> <p> The APUs are also slated by VR-Zone to use GCN architecture for the integrated graphics portion.  The main competition is from Intel’s Bay-Trail-D range of processors, which we have seen samples being announced.  While the standard FS1b socket for Kabini is current, the rumor extends that this will be called AM1 for the new socketed APUs.</p> <p> The current rumoured line up sits as:</p> <div> <table border="0" style="color: rgb(52, 52, 52); line-height: normal;" width="100%"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="contentwhite" colspan="5"> AMD AM1 Kabini</td> <td class="contentwhite" colspan="2"> AMD FT3 Kabini</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;">  </td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> A6-5350</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> A4-5150</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> E2-3850</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> E1-2650</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> A6-5200</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> E1-2500</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Cores / Threads</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2 / 2</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2 / 2</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> CPU MHz</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2050</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1600</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1300</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1450</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2000</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1400</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> GPU</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD 8400</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD 8400</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD 8280</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD 8240</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD 8400</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD 8240</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> GPU SPs</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 128</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 128</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 128</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 128</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 128</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 128</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> GPU MHz</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 600</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 600</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 450</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 400</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 600</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 400</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> L2 Cache</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> TDP</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p> As we can see, the desktop related socketed parts are closely related to those already in systems using a BGA interface (FT3).</p> <p> For comparison, here are some Bay Trail-D parts and equivalent power Silvermont:</p> <div> <table border="0" style="color: rgb(52, 52, 52); line-height: normal;" width="100%"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="contentwhite" colspan="4"> Intel BayTrail-D 
BGA1170</td> <td class="contentwhite" colspan="2"> Intel Haswell
LGA1150</td> <td class="contentwhite" colspan="2"> Intel Avoton
BGA1283</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;">  </td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Celeron J1850</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Pentium J2850</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Celeron J1750</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Celeron 
G1820</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Xeon E3-1230L V3</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Atom C2750</td> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Atom C2530</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> Cores / Threads</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2 / 2</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2 / 2</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 8</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 8 / 8</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 / 4</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> CPU MHz
(Turbo)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2000</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2410</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2410</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2700</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1800
(2800)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2400 (2600)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1700 (2000)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> GPU</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD (Ivy Bridge)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD (Ivy Bridge)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD (Ivy Bridge)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> HD
(Haswell)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> N/A</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> N/A</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> GPU MHz
(Turbo)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 688
(792)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 688
(792)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 688
(750)</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1050</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> N/A</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> N/A</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> N/A</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> L2 Cache</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1 MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 512KB +
2MB L3</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 1MB +
8MB L3</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 4 MB</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 2 MB</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="tlgrey" style="text-align: center;"> TDP</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 10 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 10 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 10 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 53 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 25 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 20 W</td> <td style="text-align: center;"> 9 W</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <p> The main advantage AMD has with socketed Kabini is that Intel’s socketed offering in this range comes down to low powered –T and –TE processors from Haswell, which are expensive but offer higher performance, which is not always needed.  Intel’s main low power Atom/Bay Trail range is still all BGA, meaning that the socketed Kabini route has potential for upgrades should AMD expand the processor line. The use of GCN with Kabini also offers up on the compute front, something which the Intel Haswell/Avoton line lack and the BayTrail-D line might fall up short.</p> <p> What would be exciting to see is if AMD plan to keep this socket for Beema (Beema replaces Kabini in 2014, Mullins replaces Temash) which also provides a further upgrade path.</p> <p>  </p> </p>
<div class='mf-viral'><table border='0'><tr><td valign='middle'>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td valign='middle'></td></tr></table></div><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/>

Read more...

Source: AnandTech
This channel features the latest computer hardware related articles.