News BoT
RSS Feed
Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 32637
 |
 Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:00 am Post subject: Intel Ivy Bridge-E Pricing Leaked |
  |
|
<p align="center"> </p><p><p>
Yesterday VR-Zone leaked information on the initial pricing expected for Ivy Bridge-E (IVB-E) processors, which we’ve reproduce in the table below. The LGA-2011 platform is an interesting departure from the norm for consumers, so we also wanted to discuss what’s happening there and why we’re only seeing IVB-E launch <em>after</em> Haswell just came out. But first, let’s start with a discussion of pricing; we’ve included the existing Sandy Bridge-E (SNB-E) as well. (Note that it appears the image from VR-Zone has incorrect Turbo Boost clocks for the IVB-E parts; we provided earlier estimates last month.)</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" class="contentwhite" colspan="8">
<strong>Ivy Bridge-E Leaked Pricing and Specs</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<strong>SKU</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-4960X</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-3970X</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-3960X</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-4930K</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-3930K</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-4820K</strong></td>
<td>
<strong>i7-3820</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<strong>Cores/Threads</strong></td>
<td>
6/12</td>
<td>
6/12</td>
<td>
6/12</td>
<td>
6/12</td>
<td>
6/12</td>
<td>
4/8</td>
<td>
4/8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<strong>Speed/Turbo (GHz)</strong></td>
<td>
3.6/4.0</td>
<td>
3.7/4.0</td>
<td>
3.5/3.9</td>
<td>
3.4/3.9</td>
<td>
3.2/3.8</td>
<td>
3.7/3.9</td>
<td>
3.6/3.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<strong>L3 Cache</strong></td>
<td>
15MB</td>
<td>
15MB</td>
<td>
15MB</td>
<td>
12MB</td>
<td>
12MB</td>
<td>
10MB</td>
<td>
10MB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<strong>TDP</strong></td>
<td>
130W</td>
<td>
150W</td>
<td>
130W</td>
<td>
130W</td>
<td>
130W</td>
<td>
130W</td>
<td>
130W</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<strong>Price (Online)</strong></td>
<td>
$990</td>
<td>
$1,059
($1,030)</td>
<td>
$1,059
($1,070)</td>
<td>
$555</td>
<td>
$594
($570)</td>
<td>
$310</td>
<td>
$305
($300)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
There are a few interesting takeaways this round. First, pricing on the IVB-E parts is mostly lower than the SNB-E SKUs they’re replacing. We expect IPC to be slightly better on IVB-E thanks to architectural enhancements, so in general we’re looking at improved performance at lower prices. The 4820K is the exception, priced $5 more than the 3820. IVB-E also reduces the TDP on the highest performing 4960X part to 130W, which makes sense considering the process shrink.</p>
<p>
Something else to note is that the upcoming i7-4820K is also priced quite a bit lower than i7-4770K (and even i7-3770K). If you’re not worried about Intel’s iGPU solutions—which is likely the case if you’re considering LGA-2011—the price point is now even lower, and you still get quad-channel memory and additional PCIe 3.0 lanes. Even the LGA-2011 motherboards are priced relatively competitively these days, at least for the mainstream models—LGA-1150 boards with four DIMM slots and at least two PCIe 3.0 slots are only $20-$40 cheaper, and the higher quality offerings can even surpass pricing for LGA-2011 boards.</p>
<p>
The more interesting discussion is what we’re not seeing. For one, there’s still no inexpensive hex-core solution; you either spend $555 or more, or you get a quad-core part. Considering the process shrink, IVB-E chips should be quite a bit smaller and therefore less expensive for Intel to manufacture relative to SNB-E, and while reduced pricing is nice many were hoping for a budget hex-core processor.</p>
<p>
The other item we won’t see (which isn’t in the above table) is new chipsets/motherboards for Ivy Bridge-E. Oh, there will likely be a few new boards, but this isn’t a new platform launch. IVB-E should be a drop-in replacement for SNB-E with a BIOS update, and all of the Tier-1 OEMs are promising support for the new processors. But if you already have SNB-E, will IVB-E be enough of an upgrade to justify the expense of a new processor? We’ll have to wait for the official launch for that discussion, but at least right now that’s looking like a tough sell.</p>
<p>
The question most people have with IVB-E is why it even exists in the first place—SNB-E launched after IVB on the consumer side and over a year after SNB showed up, and with Haswell having just come out we’re still a month or more away from IVB-E. Shouldn’t we be looking for Haswell-E instead? The answer is actually a lot less complex than you might suspect, and it goes along with the lack of new motherboards/chipset. LGA-2011 is basically the consumer version of Intel’s Xeon platform; nothing more, nothing less. Oh, you get unlocked CPU multipliers and motherboards targeted more at the enthusiast market (frequently with tons of overclocking options), and you don’t need ECC memory, but LGA-2011 is just a minor tweak to the single-socket Xeon offerings.</p>
<p>
Unlike the desktop world where yearly upgrades are common and even encouraged by the manufacturers, Xeon plays in a different market that doesn’t like rapid change. The server cadence from Intel is two generations of support, so each new platform stays around a lot longer. Bringing in Haswell-E would require moving to a new socket, violating the every socket has to stick around for two generations requirement in Xeon-land. So we're stuck with Ivy Bridge for the next year, with Haswell-E likely showing up in late 2014. Paraphrasing what we said back at the Sandy Bridge-E launch: If you happen to have a heavily threaded workload that needs the absolute best performance, it looks like Ivy Bridge-E can deliver. Professional overclockers are also likely to be thrilled that IVB-E should take care of the cold boot bugs seen on other platforms. But for many users, the new Haswell platforms are likely to be more compelling.</p>
<p>
What's going to be in your next build? Are you waiting for Ivy Bridge-E or is a quad-core Haswell more than enough? Or is there something else entirely?</p>
</p>
Read more...
Source: AnandTech
This channel features the latest computer hardware related articles. |
|
